Website is intended for physicians
Search:
Всего найдено: 2

 

Abstract:

Immediate and long-term results of pharmacologically "facilitated" percutaneous coronary inter-ventions (PCI) evaluated in 172 patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Pharmacological reperfusion tried prior to PCA with thrombolytic therapy (TLT, streptokinase or tenecteplase) in 81% of patients, and combination TLT + glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab) in 19%. Average symptom onset to reperfusion time was 197±103 min.

Immediately after PCI 88% patients in both groups presented TIMI - 3 flow (р<0.01 to the initial). Repeated PCI during the hospital stay performed in 4 patients (3 in TLT group, 1 in TLT + abciximab group) with recurrent ischemia or subacute vessel occlusion as a cause of intervention. CABG needed in 2 cases. In-hospital survival rate after 'facilitated' PCI was 98,6 - 100%. 6 months clinical follow-up done in 67% of survivors, 16% of them required admission to hospital (recurrent angina due to restenosis), in 9% patients repeated PCI was performed, 6% underwent coronary bypass grafting. All the repeated procedures were success. Overall 6 months mortality was 5%. This prospective study has shown both immediate and long-term safety and efficiency of "facilitated" coronary interventions in patients with myocardial infarction.

 

Reference 

 

1.     Lincoff A.M., Topol E.J. Illusion of reperfusion: does anyone achieve optimal reperfusion during acute myocardial infarction? Circulation. 1993; 87: 1792-1805.

 

 

2.     FibrinolyticTherapy Trialist's (FTT) Collaborative Group. Indication for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomized trials of more than 1,000 patients. Lancet. 1994; 343: 311-322.

 

 

3.     Gibbons R.J., Holmes D.R., Reeder G.S. et al. Immediate angioplasty compared with the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment for myocardial infarction. N. Engl.J. Med. 1993; 328: 685-691.

 

 

4.     Grines C.L., Browne K.F., Marco J. et al. For the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial Infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993; 328: 673-679.

 

 

5.     Simoons M.L., Serruys P.W., van den Brand M. et al. Early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: limitation of infarct size and improved survival. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1986; 7: 717-728.

 

 

6.     The GUSTO IIb Angioplasty Substudy Investigators. A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl.J. Med. 1997; 336: 1621-1628.

 

 

7.     GUSTO Angiographic Investigators.The comparative effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary artery patency, ventricular function, and survival after myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J.Med. 1993; 329: 1615-1622.

 

 

8.     Vermeer F., Oude Ophuis A.J.M. et al. Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: a safety and feasibility study. Heart. 1999; 82: 426-431.

 

 

9.     CORAMI Study Group. Outcome of attempted rescue coronary angioplasty after failed thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 1994; 74: 172-174.

 

 

10.   Ellis S.G., Da Silva R.E., Heyndrickx G. et al. Randomized comparison of rescue angioplasty with conservative management of patients with early failure of thrombolysis for acute anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1994; 90: 2280-2284.

 

 

11.   Ross A.M., Lundergan C.F., Rohrbeck S.C. et al. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolysis: technical and clinical outcomes in a large thrombolysis trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1998; 31: 1511-1517.

 

 

12.   Ellis S.G., Da Silva E.R., Spaulding C.M. et al. Review of immediate angioplasty after fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: insights from the RESCUE I, RESCUE II, and other contemporary clinical experiences. Am. Heart. J. 2000; 139: 1046-1053.

 

 

13.   Lefkovits J., Ivanhoe R.J., Califf R.M. et al. Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade by a chimeric monoclonal antibody (abciximab) on acute and six-month outcomes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial in farction. Am.J. Cardiol. 1996; 77: 1045-1051.

 

 

14.   Neumann F.J., Blasini R., Schmitt C. et al. Effect of glycoprotein I Ib/II Ia receptor blockade on recovery of coronary flow and left ventricular function after the placement of coronary-artery stents in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998; 98: 2695-2701.

 

 

15.   Antoniucci D., Santoro G.M., Bolognese L. et al. A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct-related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: Results from the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) trial.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1998; 31: 1234-1239.

 

 

16.   Antoniucci D., Valenti R., Santoro G.M. et al. Primary coronary infarct artery stenting in acute myocardial in farction. Am.J. Cardiol. 1999; 84: 505-510.

 

 

17.   Pershukov I., Batyraliev T., Niyazova-Karben Z. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Direct Stenting in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 2003; 59: 125-126.

 

 

18.   Rodriguez A., Bernardi V., Fernandez M. et al. In-hospital and late results of coronary stents versus conventional balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (GRAMI trial). Am.J. Cardiol. 1998; 81:1286-1291.

 

 

19.   Stone G.W., Brodie B.R., Griffin J.J. et al. Clinical and angiographic follow-up after primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction. Тhe Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) Stent Pilot Trial. Circulation. 1999; 99: 1548-1554.

 

 

20.   Petronio A.S., Musumeci G., Limbruno U. et al. Abciximab Improves 6-Month Clinical Outcome After Rescue Coronary Angioplasty. Am. Heart.J. 2002; 143 (2): 334-341.

 

 

21.   Miller J.M., Smalling R., Ohman M. et al. Effectivennes of early coronay angioplasty and abciximab for failed thrombolysis (reteplase or alteplase) during acute myocardial infarction (results from the GUSTO-III Trial). Am.J. Cardiol. 1999; 84: 779-784.

 

 

22.   Jong P., Lazzam C., Cohen E. et al. Bleeding risks with abciximab post thrombolysis in rescue or urgent angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction [abstract 971]. Circulation. 1999; 100: 188.

 

 

23.   Sundlof D.W., Rerkpattanapitat P., Wongprapanut N. et al. Incidence of bleeding complications associated with abciximab use in conjunction with thrombolytic therapy in patients requiring percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am.J. Cardiol. 1999; 83: 1569-1571.

 

 

24.   Neumann F.J., Blasini R., Schmitt С et al. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade on recovery of coronary flow and left ventricular function after the placement of coronary-artery stents in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998; 98: 2695-2701.

 

 

25.   Keeley E.C., Boura J.A., Grines C.L. Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials. Lancet. 2006; 367: 579-588.

 

 

26.   Stone G.W., Gersh B.J. Facilitated angioplasty: paradise lost. Lancet. 2006; 367: 543-546.

 

 

27.   Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ASSENT-4 PCI) investigators. Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acutemyocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomized trial. Lancet. 2006; 367: 569-578.

 

           28.   Шпектор А.В., Васильева Е.Ю., Артамонов В.Г. и др. Комбинированная реперфузия у больных острым инфарктом миокарда. Кардиология. 2007; 6: 27-30.

 

 

Abstract:

We present the clinical case of the effective and safe application of the «Filterwire EZ» embolic protection device (Boston Scientific, USA) for prevention of «no-reflow» phenomenon during primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty in a patient with acute myocardial infarction.

During performing of balloon angioplasty of infarct-related segment of the circumflex left coronary artery with the protection of the distal segments of artery by «Filterwire EZ» device the embolic event was observed. After the final stent implantation the thrombus was removed by embolic protection device, size of the thrombus - 3x4 mm. Control coronarography confirmed the TIMI 3 blood flow in the infarct-related coronary artery.

Presence of different types of devices for capturing or removing of thrombotic masses in the arsenal of interventional cardiologist can improve the results of primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. 

 

References 

1.     Jerlih A.D., Gracianskij N.A. i uchastniki registra REKORD. Nezavisimyj registr ostryh koronarnyh sindromov REKORD. Harakteristika bol'nyh i lechenie do vypiski iz stacionara. Aterotromboz 2009; 1: 105-119 [In Russ].

2.     Jerlih A.D., Gracianskij N.A. i uchastniki registra REKORD. Lechenie bol'nyh s ostrym koronarnym sindromom s pod#emom ST v stacionarah imejuwih i ne imejuwih vozmozhnosti vypolnenija chreskozhnyh koronarnyh vmeshatel'stv (dannye registra «REKORD»). Aterotromboz. 2009; 1: 120-122 [In Russ].

3.     Jerlih A.D., Gracianskij N.A. ot imeni uchastnikov registra REKORD. Registr ostryh koronarnyh sindromov REKORD. Harakteristika bol'nyh i lechenie do vypiski iz stacionara. Kardiologija. 2009; 7: 4-12 [In Russ].

4.     Anderson J.L., Adams C.D., Antman E.M. et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction — executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007; 50: 652-726.

5.     Bhatt D.L., Roe M.T., Peterson E.D. et al. Utilization of early invasive management strategies for high-risk patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative. JAMA. 2004; 292: 2096-104.

6.     Birkhead J.S., Walker L., Pearson M. et al., on behalf of the MINAP Steering Group Improving care for patients with acute coronary syndromes: initial results from the National Audit of Myocardial Infarction Project (MINAP). Heart. 2004; 90: 1004-1009.

7.     Elbarouni B., Goodman S.G., Yan R.T. et al. on behalf of the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE2) Investigators. Validation of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE) risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Canada. Am. Heart. J. 2009; 158: 392-399.

8.     Hasdai D., Behar S., Wallentin L. et al. A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. The Euro Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes (Euro Heart Survey ACS). Eur. Heart. J. 2002; 23: 1190-1201

9.     Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STsegment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomized trial. Lancet. 2006; 367: 569-578.

10.   Gershlick A.H., Stephens-Lloyd A., Hughes S. et al. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005; 353: 2758-2768.

11.   Kushner F.G., Hand M., Smith S.C. et al. 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report of the  American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009; 54: 2205-2241.

12.   Eeckhout E., Kern M.J. The coronary no-reflow phenomenon: a review of mechanisms and therapies. European. Heart. Journal. 2001; 22: 729-739.

13.   Van de WF, Bax J, Betriu A, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation. Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. Heart. J. 2008; 29: 2909-2945.

14.   Baim D.S., Braunwald E., Feit F., Knatterud G.L., Passarnani E.R., Robertson T.L., et al. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial phase II: additional information and perspectives. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1990; 15: 1188-1192.

15.   Leonardo Galiuto, Antonio G. Rebuzzi, Filippo Crea. The no-reflow phenomenon. JACC. 2009; 2(1): 85-86.

16.   Rogers W.J., Baim D.S., Gore J.M., Brown B.G., Roberts R., Williams D.O., et al. Comparison of immediate invasive, delayed invasive, and conservative strategies after tissue-type plasminogen activator. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Phase II-A trial. Circulation. 1990; 81: 1457-1476.

17.   Hori M., Inoue M., Kitakaze M. et al. Role of adenosine in hyperemic response of coronary blood flow in microembolization. Am. J. Physiol. 1986; 250: 509-518.

18.   Tanaka A. No-reflow phenomenon and lesion morphology in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002; 105: 2148-2152.

19.   Henriques J., Zijlstra F., Ottervanger J. et al. Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart. J. 2002; 23: 1112-1117.

20.   Karila-Cohen D., Czitrom D., Brochet E. et al. Decreased no-reflow in patients with anterior myocardial infarction and pre-infarction angina. Eur. Heart. J.1999; 20: 1724-1730.

ANGIOLOGIA.ru (АНГИОЛОГИЯ.ру) - портал о диагностике и лечении заболеваний сосудистой системы